Case citation: Peck v Lateu (1973) 117 SJ 185
The case Peck v Lateu (1973) involved two women who had agreed to share any money won through bingo. This case is significant because it addresses the legal question of whether an agreement between individuals in a social setting, such as friends or acquaintances, can be treated as a legally binding contract. Generally, the law presumes that such social agreements are not intended to create legal relations unless there is clear evidence to the contrary. However, in Peck v. Lateu, the court rebutted this presumption and found that the women had indeed intended to create legal relations, thus making their agreement enforceable.
This case is often referenced when considering similar disputes, such as those that may arise from lottery pool agreements among friends or colleagues. Although there have been no specific court cases involving lottery disputes, the same legal principles would likely apply. Courts may enforce such agreements when there is evidence of a clear intention to create legal relations, even if this intention is initially presumed to be absent in social arrangements.
Cases like Peck v Lateu highlight the importance of understanding the potential legal consequences of informal agreements, especially when there is a financial stake involved.
List of references:
https://fdvn.vn/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/luu-ban-nhap-tu-dong-4-1.pdf
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:
MORE FROM CONTRACT LAW: