Case Name: Burrell v Harmer
- Citation: [1967] Crim LR 169
- Court: High Court of Justice (England and Wales)
- Year: 1967
- Area of Law: Criminal Law – Consent; Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm (ABH)
Burrell v Harmer [1967] Crim LR 169 is an important English criminal law case that examines the limits of consent, particularly in relation to minors.
Key Facts (Burrell v Harmer)
The defendant, a tattoo artist, tattooed two boys aged 12 and 13. Although the boys had agreed to the process, the defendant was charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm under Section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861.
Legal Issue
The main question was whether the boys’ consent to the tattooing constituted a valid legal defence to the assault accusation.
Judgment in Burrell v Harmer
The court held that the boys’ consent was invalid. It determined that the minors lacked the capacity to comprehend the nature and consequences of receiving a tattoo, rendering their consent ineffective. Consequently, the defendant’s conviction was upheld. The actions amounted to assault.
Legal Significance
This judgement established the fact that consent cannot be used as a legitimate defence in assault proceedings unless the individual has the capacity to comprehend the nature of the act. In the case of minors, this means they must be mature enough to understand the consequences of their consent. The ruling stressed that simply agreeing is insufficient; the consenting person must have the mental capacity to make an informed decision.
List of references used:
- https://www.coursehero.com/file/pk0j1d/Burrell-v-Harmer-1965-3-All-ER-684-Facts-The-defendant-tattooed-two-boys-aged-12
- https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/criminal-law/consent-defence-criminal-law-3735.php
- https://www.e-lawresources.co.uk/the-defence-of-consent-in-criminal-law
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE:
MORE FROM CRIMINAL LAW:
- Fagan v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis: Actus Reus
- Hardman v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset Constabulary [1986]
- R v Fiak [2005] EWCA Crim 2381 Court of Appeal
Ruchi is a legal research writer with an academic background in CA, MBA (Finance), and M.Com. She specializes in digesting and summarizing complex judicial decisions into clear and structured case notes for students and legal professionals.